Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-crafted, lean behavioral policy: it gives a concrete precedence-ordered decision procedure with exact tool calls and careful evidence-scoping rules, organized in clean self-contained sections. The main improvement opportunities are removing the small amount of duplicated guidance and adding a concrete credential-check step plus a post-choice verification step.
Suggestions
Deduplicate repeated rules (the @default caveat and the remembered-ID warning each appear twice) to tighten the token budget.
Replace 'check relevant credentials, including Gateway credits' with the concrete command or lookup used to check them.
Add a short final step to verify the chosen model is accepted (e.g., by confirming it resolves in the workflow) to close the selection loop.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense, imperative policy with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows ('Do not question its validity', 'A generic 404 ... does not alone prove global model nonexistence'). However, a few points are stated twice — 'Do not treat @default as a builder-hint recommendation' appears in both the intro and step 3, and the remembered-ID warning appears in both the intro and the search guidance — so it is not perfectly lean. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is highly concrete, including exact tool calls with parameters ('searchModels({ provider: "openrouter", query: "claude" })', 'nodes(action="explore-resources")') and precise namespace rules for OpenRouter IDs. Minor gaps remain, e.g., 'check relevant credentials, including Gateway credits' gives no concrete command, so it falls just short of the fully executable level-5 anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | 'Choose the source' is an explicit precedence-ordered 4-step procedure (preserve existing model → credential lookup → @builderHint → searchModels), and the 'Diagnose availability' section distinguishes actual failure evidence from guesses. This is not a destructive or batch skill, so no validation cap applies, but there is no explicit verify step after a model is chosen, keeping it below the level-5 anchor with feedback loops. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is fully self-contained with no bundle files (references/, scripts/, and assets/ are absent), clear section headers, and no nested references. All content legitimately belongs in the single file, and navigation is easy, satisfying the well-organized-structure standard for a reference-free skill. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |