Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is well-structured, actionable, and sequenced with concrete orchestrator-specific conventions and a revision feedback loop. It lands at 4 across all dimensions due to minor verbosity, the absence of a worked example, no in-flow validation checkpoint, and limited file-splitting.
Suggestions
Add one concise worked example of a filled-in build-workflow task spec (with the Outcome/Done-when labels populated) to lift actionability toward 5.
Trim the longest bullets in 'Assumptions And Questions' by merging near-duplicate credential rules, improving conciseness.
Consider moving the detailed 'Task Graph Rules' label-by-label spec into a separate reference file and keeping a brief summary inline, improving progressive disclosure.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is efficient and assumes Claude's competence — it never explains basic concepts — but sections like 'Assumptions And Questions' and 'Task Graph Rules' have a few rules that could be tightened, matching the 'efficient; minor instances of over-explanation' anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Gives concrete executable guidance — exact tool calls ('load_tool', 'create-tasks'), exact parameter values ('planningContext.source: "planning-skill"', 'postBuildRunRequested: true'), and an ordered spec-label schema — but lacks a fully worked task-graph example, so it sits at 4 rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 8-step Method is a clear sequence with a plan-worthiness gate (step 1) and a rejection feedback loop in 'Revisions' ('revise surgically ... call create-tasks again'), but there is no explicit validate-then-retry checkpoint inside the core flow, matching the 'clear sequence with most checkpoints' anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into clearly headed sections with a well-signaled one-level-deep external reference (the Knowledge Base paths); no bundle files exist to split further, but the body is long enough that a couple of detailed rule sections could plausibly live in a reference file, so it is 4 rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |