CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

add-deltachat

Add DeltaChat channel integration via @deltachat/stdio-rpc-server. Native adapter — no Chat SDK bridge. Email-based messaging with end-to-end encryption.

65

Quality

79%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Medium

Suggest reviewing before use

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./.claude/skills/add-deltachat/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is highly actionable with copy-paste-ready commands, a clear validated install workflow, and thorough troubleshooting, while remaining lean. Its main weakness is that a sizeable chunk of reference material is inlined in a single file rather than progressively disclosed into bundle files.

Suggestions

Move the full Troubleshooting catalog and Connectivity model/env-var reference tables into a separate reference file (e.g., references/TROUBLESHOOTING.md) and link to it from SKILL.md to improve progressive disclosure.

Tighten the lengthy registration-test rationale on the Install step into a compact sentence or two to lift conciseness toward 5.

Consider a brief inline 'Use when' cue mirroring the description gap, so the body itself signals when this skill applies.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Dense, competence-assuming prose with no conceptual padding, though a few lengthy explanatory passages (e.g., the registration-test rationale) could be trimmed.

4 / 5

Actionability

Copy-paste-ready, pinned commands throughout (nc:copy/append/dep, build, vitest, SQL, ncl, dns lookup) with explicitly flagged user-supplied placeholders covering install, wiring, and troubleshooting.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Clearly sequenced numbered steps with an explicit build+test validation gate ('Both must be clean before proceeding'), a registration-test guard, and ordered troubleshooting checklists with error-recovery flows.

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Self-contained with well-organized, clearly headed sections and no nested references, but it is a fairly long monolithic doc where reference-style content (troubleshooting, connectivity tables, env catalog) is inlined rather than split into bundle files.

4 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Description

70%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is specific and distinct, clearly naming the platform and integration approach, but it omits any explicit 'when to use' trigger guidance, which limits its completeness. Adding a 'Use when...' clause would round it out.

Suggestions

Add an explicit 'Use when...' clause (e.g., 'Use when adding DeltaChat as a messaging channel or when the user mentions DeltaChat/email-based chat integration') to satisfy the 'when' half of completeness.

Include natural synonyms a user might say ('Delta Chat', 'chat', 'messaging app') alongside 'DeltaChat' to broaden trigger-term coverage.

Optionally enumerate one or two concrete runtime actions (wiring DMs/groups, configuring credentials) to push specificity from 4 toward 5.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain and several concrete specifics (native adapter, no Chat SDK bridge, email-based messaging, E2E encryption), but stops short of a comprehensive enumerated action list.

4 / 5

Completeness

The 'what' is clear, but there is no 'Use when...' or equivalent explicit trigger guidance, which caps completeness at 3 per the rubric.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

'DeltaChat' and 'channel integration' are natural user terms, though 'stdio-rpc-server' is jargon and common synonyms like 'chat' are absent.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Targets a specific named platform (DeltaChat) with a distinct 'Add DeltaChat channel' trigger and minimal overlap risk with other skills.

5 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

referenced_paths_exist

Referenced path issues: 4 missing

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
nanocoai/nanoclaw
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.