CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo
SkillPublic

add-linear

Add Linear channel integration via Chat SDK. Issue comment threads as conversations.

Quality

78%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./.claude/skills/add-linear/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

This is a highly actionable, well-sequenced setup skill: exact commands, file paths, env writes, and validation gates with genuine error-recovery guidance in Troubleshooting. Its main weakness is repetition — the @-mention fact and several operational caveats are stated multiple times, and a hard-pinned dependency version will drift. Structure is good for a single-file skill, though Troubleshooting and Channel Info could live in a reference file.

Suggestions

State the "Linear OAuth apps can't be @-mentioned, so the agent answers every comment" fact once (intro or Channel Info) and cut the repeats in the Apply preamble, Wiring, and Channel Info.

De-duplicate the WEBHOOK_HOST=0.0.0.0 guidance — keep it in one place (Troubleshooting or the Credentials prompt), not both.

Flag the pinned "@chat-adapter/linear@4.41.1" version as time-sensitive (e.g. a short maintenance note on how to re-pin) so the exact version doesn't silently go stale.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The prose is project-specific and operational, but the same facts repeat: "no @-mention needed" / "Linear can't be @-mentioned" appears in the intro ("Every comment on a Linear issue triggers the agent — no @-mention needed"), the Apply preamble, Wiring ("Linear can't be @-mentioned, so the agent answers every comment"), and Channel Info ("No @-mention needed (Linear OAuth apps can't be @-mentioned)"); the WEBHOOK_HOST=0.0.0.0 guidance appears in both the Credentials prompt and Troubleshooting; self-message filtering is explained three times. This is more than the "minor instances" of the 4 anchor, though the content itself is not padded with concepts Claude already knows, so it sits above a 2; the time-sensitive pinned version "@chat-adapter/linear@4.41.1" also counts against conciseness per the rubric guidelines.

3 / 5

Actionability

Fully executable throughout: exact directive fences with file paths ("src/channels/linear.ts", "nc:append to:src/channels/index.ts"), copy-paste commands ("pnpm exec vitest run src/channels/linear-registration.test.ts", "ncl messaging-groups create --channel-type linear --platform-id linear:{{linear_team_key}} ..."), exact env var names, and concrete Linear UI navigation ("Linear Settings > API > Webhooks > New webhook"). The common cases are covered, including the fallback Personal-API-key path.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The sequence (Prerequisites → Apply → Credentials → Wiring → Next Steps) has an explicit validation gate — "Both must be clean before proceeding" after the build and test steps — plus explained failure semantics and error-recovery loops in Troubleshooting ("red means the barrel import or the @chat-adapter/linear install drifted, so re-run the Apply steps"). This matches the anchor for clear sequencing with explicit validation and feedback loops.

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

A single-file skill (no references/, scripts/, or assets/ bundle) with well-organized, clearly headed sections (Prerequisites, Apply, Credentials, Wiring, Next Steps, Channel Info, Troubleshooting) and no nested references — the one external pointer ("see the GitHub skill for adding members") is one level and clearly signaled. It is not a 5 because the file runs ~200 lines with Channel Info and Troubleshooting as candidate material for a separate reference file, and there is no overview/navigation of the sections.

4 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Description

65%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is concise, names a distinct niche, and gives a clear "what", but it lacks any explicit "when to use" trigger clause, which caps its completeness and limits its discovery value. Trigger-term coverage is good though short of comprehensive. Adding a use-when clause and one or two more concrete actions would lift it substantially.

Suggestions

Add an explicit trigger clause, e.g. "Use when adding a Linear channel, connecting Linear issue comments to an agent, or when the user mentions Linear integration or Linear bots."

Name one or two more concrete capabilities (e.g. webhook setup, team wiring, per-thread sessions) to raise specificity beyond a single action.

Include a natural synonym such as "Linear bot" or "connect Linear" to broaden trigger-term coverage.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

"Add Linear channel integration via Chat SDK" names the domain and one concrete action, and "Issue comment threads as conversations" states the behavior model — matching the anchor for domain plus 1-2 concrete actions. It is not a 4 because no further specific actions (webhook setup, wiring, credentials) are listed, and not a 2 because the actions given are concrete rather than generic.

3 / 5

Completeness

The "what" is clear ("Add Linear channel integration via Chat SDK. Issue comment threads as conversations.") but there is no "Use when..." clause or equivalent explicit trigger guidance, capping completeness at 3 per the rubric guidelines. It is not a 2 because the "what" half is concrete, not vague.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Natural terms a user would say are present: "Linear", "channel integration", "issue comment threads", "conversations" — good coverage well above the single-generic-keyword anchor. It falls short of 5 because common variations like "Linear bot", "connect Linear", or "Linear comments" are missing.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

"Linear" pins the skill to a specific product and "channel integration via Chat SDK" plus "issue comment threads as conversations" carves out a clear niche with distinct triggers. Minor overlap exists only with other channel-integration skills, which the Linear specificity separates — matching the minimal-conflict-risk anchor.

5 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository

nanocoai/nanoclaw

Path

.claude/skills/add-linear/SKILL.md

Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.