Content
77%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable with a clear, validated build-test-verify workflow, but is somewhat padded with concepts Claude already knows and keeps all content inline rather than splitting detail into reference files.
Suggestions
Trim restatements of concepts Claude already knows (e.g. why components-inside-components remount, why direct imports save time) and consolidate the anti-patterns with the rules they restate.
Move the long quality-coding rules or anti-patterns into a reference file referenced one level deep from the main workflow to improve progressive disclosure.
De-duplicate the visual-verification checklist against the inline 'Always verify' / 'Verify when relevant' rules to reduce repetition.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient and assumes competence, but explains concepts Claude already knows ('causes remounts, lost focus, broken state', 'saves 200-800ms per import', WCAG contrast) and the checklist/anti-patterns repeat earlier rules, so it could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable commands (`pnpm run build 2>&1`, `agent-browser screenshot`, `vercel deploy`) and copy-paste-ready code with specific values, matching the score-3 anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 6-step build-to-verify sequence with explicit validation checkpoints (build must pass, console-error check) and an iteration feedback loop with a 3-attempt escape, matching the score-3 anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into sections, but everything is inline in one ~150-line file with no external references, so content that could be split (quality rules, anti-patterns) is not separated. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |