Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable and well-structured, with a concrete template, exact write targets, a mandatory execution order, and validation plus outcome-tracking feedback loops. The only meaningful gap is the absence of explicit error-recovery guidance when a memory_write fails.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly lean with concrete templates and exact paths, but the opening "Decisions are durable knowledge — they explain why a path was chosen..." is mild motivational padding Claude could infer, keeping it just below a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | It provides a complete copy-paste-ready decision template with frontmatter fields, exact memory_write call targets, precise file paths, and a mandatory numbered execution order that covers the common recording cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear mandatory sequence (write decision → optional follow-on writes → only then confirm) with an explicit validation gate (never confirm unless memory_write succeeded) and an outcome-tracking feedback loop, but no retry/error-recovery guidance on a failed write. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Content is well-organized into clear sections (Detection, Recording, Follow-through, Outcome tracking, Confirmation) with no external references needed; the inline template is reasonable, though the skill sits above the under-50-line simple-skill threshold. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |