CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

delegation

Helps users delegate tasks, break them into steps, set deadlines, and track progress via routines and memory.

57

Quality

66%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/delegation/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a lean, well-sequenced delegation workflow with concrete tool calls and an explicit confirmation checkpoint. It earns top marks on progressive disclosure as a compact single-purpose skill, and is held to 4 elsewhere only by minor trim opportunities and the lack of fully copy-paste-ready code.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is lean and avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows; each section is a tight action directive, with only minor phrasing that could be trimmed.

4 / 5

Actionability

Concrete tool calls are named (memory_write to tasks/{task-name}.md, builtin__trigger_create, builtin__outbound_deliver) with specific field guidance, though no copy-paste code block is given so it stops short of fully executable examples.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

A clear six-step sequence with an explicit 'confirm the plan with the user before starting' checkpoint and final status update; minor gaps are the absence of a re-validation loop after task-file updates.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Under 50 lines with no external bundle files needed; content is well-organized into clearly headed sections that fit the single-purpose skill exception, scoring 5 with just well-organized sections.

5 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Description

51%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description states concrete capabilities but omits an explicit 'Use when...' trigger clause, capping completeness at 3 and leaving trigger-term quality weak. Distinctiveness is moderate given the broad task-management framing.

Suggestions

Add an explicit 'Use when...' clause naming natural trigger phrases (e.g. 'Use when the user wants to hand off a task, set a deadline, or track recurring work').

Surface natural user phrasings directly in the description prose rather than relying solely on the keywords block.

Narrow the framing to reduce overlap with generic task-management skills (e.g. name the routine/memory mechanism as the differentiator).

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists several concrete actions ('delegate tasks, break them into steps, set deadlines, and track progress via routines and memory') rather than vague verbs, but lacks file-type or technical specifics seen in 5-anchor examples.

4 / 5

Completeness

It clearly answers 'what' (delegate/break/track) but has no explicit 'Use when...' clause or trigger guidance, which the rubric caps at 3.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

The description itself contains almost no natural user trigger phrases ('delegate', 'remind me to' live only in the frontmatter keywords block, not in the description text), so users saying 'take care of this' wouldn't be surfaced by the prose alone.

2 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The domain is somewhat specific (delegation + tracking) but 'help managing something' overlaps broadly with general task-management and reminder skills, leaving moderate conflict risk.

3 / 5

Total

12

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
nearai/ironclaw
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.