Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tightly-engineered, codebase-specific guide: every section names the exact manifest keys, crate paths, trait seams, and test suites to touch, with concrete verification commands and an architecture-test gate as the closing checkpoint. It assumes Claude's competence and spends its tokens on things Claude could not infer.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Dense and almost entirely project-specific (crate paths, manifest keys, gate names) with no generic concept padding; a few definitional prose passages about the taxonomy could be tightened further, keeping it just below the lean-every-token-earns-its-place anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready commands ('grep -c ^\[\[tools\]\]', 'cargo test -p ironclaw_architecture_tests', 'pnpm --dir ... test') alongside exact crate, trait, and test-file paths, with exemplar manifests named for each surface type. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Each surface type has a numbered, sequenced workflow with explicit validation checkpoints (architecture-tests gate, conformance suites, frontend tests), and destructive identity-rename/migration operations are guarded by the boot-restore contract and retired-taxonomy gate. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Acts as an overview that points to one-level-deep, clearly-signaled codebase references (exemplar manifests, design docs, trait homes, sibling skills) via exact paths, with well-organized sections and no nested reference chains. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |