Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured orchestration skill with a clear sequenced workflow, concrete commands and APIs, and clean organization. It would benefit from an explicit validation feedback loop and a concrete code/template example for the structural patterns.
Suggestions
Add an explicit fix-and-retry loop in the VERIFY step (e.g., 'If lint/test fails, fix and re-run until green before presenting the PR') to reach the top workflow_clarity anchor.
Include one small copy-paste code template (e.g., a type-safe NavKey serialization route or a WindowSizeClass adaptive branch) in the Examples to lift actionability to fully executable.
Tighten the journaling-rules paragraph and philosophy maxims slightly to remove guidance a competent Compose agent already infers.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and assumes Claude's competence (references NavKey, NavDisplay, rememberViewModelStoreNavEntryDecorator without explanation), but the journaling-rules paragraph and the philosophy maxims could be trimmed slightly. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete executable commands (./gradlew ktfmtFormat, lintDebug, testDebugUnitTest), exact APIs, specific dp/prefix rules give highly actionable guidance; the descriptive 'Examples' scenarios lack copy-paste code templates, leaving a minor gap. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear PROFILE→SELECT→ORCHESTRATE→VERIFY→PRESENT sequence with validation in VERIFY (ktfmtFormat, no-crash check, tests) and the 'before creating a PR' constraint, but no explicit fix-and-retry feedback loop on validation failure. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into Goal/Constraints/Instructions/Examples sections, self-contained at ~50 lines with no bundle files, and no nested external detail references — appropriate structure for a workflow skill. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |