Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, efficient single-file skill with a clear five-step workflow, an approval gate, and concrete verification commands. It falls just short of top marks on conciseness (philosophy/journal padding), actionability (no concrete route/state snippet for the implementation step), and workflow clarity (no failure-recovery loop).
Suggestions
Trim the Philosophy section and compress the journaling rules to the essential format + do/don't list; the principles (state hoisting, type-safe navigation) are already implied by the Constraints and Instructions sections.
Add a minimal executable snippet for the ORCHESTRATE step, e.g., a two-line example of a @Serializable NavKey route object and its NavDisplay entry, so the core implementation pattern is copy-paste ready.
Add a feedback loop to the VERIFY step: what to do when ktfmtFormat, lintDebug, or testDebugUnitTest fails (fix, re-run, only proceed on green) before creating the PR.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~50-line body is dense with constraint- and command-oriented content and explains nothing Claude already knows, but the Philosophy bullets ("A screen is just a function of its state") and the verbose journaling-rules block are minor over-explanation that could be trimmed — the 4 anchor rather than the lean 5 anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete copy-paste commands ("./gradlew ktfmtFormat", "./gradlew lintDebug", "./gradlew testDebugUnitTest"), precise API references ("rememberViewModelStoreNavEntryDecorator", "800.dp" max width, NavKey serialization), and explicit PR prefix rules make the guidance mostly executable; the ORCHESTRATE step's implementation direction ("Hoist state cleanly, define type-safe kotlinx.serialization routes") stays high-level without a concrete snippet, so it falls just short of the fully executable 5 anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The PROFILE → SELECT & PROPOSE → ORCHESTRATE → VERIFY → PRESENT sequence is clear with an explicit user-approval checkpoint and verification commands, but there is no error-recovery feedback loop (e.g., what to do when lintDebug or testDebugUnitTest fails), which keeps it at the 4 anchor instead of the 5 anchor with explicit feedback loops. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | This is a single-file skill under 50 lines with well-organized sections (Goal, Constraints, Instructions, Examples) and its only external reference (.agents/skills/maestro/journal.md) is one level deep and clearly signaled — per the rubric's simple-skill note, that organization alone earns the 5 anchor; nothing that belongs in a separate file is inlined. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |