Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an exemplar of lean, pointer-style progressive disclosure that delegates detail to a well-structured reference. The main weakness is that almost all actionable and workflow content lives in the reference, so the body scores slightly below ceiling on actionability and workflow clarity.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Two lean sentences with no padding; it assumes Claude's competence and does not explain what compaction is, so every token earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Gives a concrete instruction with a named tool and exact file path ("use the `view_file` tool to read ... `references/context-recovery-workflow.md`"), but delegates the actual recovery procedure to the reference rather than embedding executable steps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The single directive is unambiguous and correctly ordered (read → adhere → before asserting state), and the referenced runbook carries the full validated sequence; the body itself only implies the checkpoints rather than stating them. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a clean overview pointing to one real one-level-deep reference with a fully-qualified path, but the reference itself contains a nested citation to another audit doc, introducing a minor second-level hop. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |