Content
70%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured router that exemplifies progressive disclosure: a lightweight overview pointing to a real one-level-deep reference. The weakest dimensions are conciseness and actionability, where jargon and fully-delegated guidance leave room to tighten.
Suggestions
Trim jargon ("graph-queryable canonical decision substrate", "procedural HOW-TO companion") to plain phrasing so every token earns its place.
Add one concrete inline cue (e.g. the required frontmatter fields or the scaffold folder shape) so the router is actionable before the reference is opened.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is short and mostly a lean pointer, but phrases like "graph-queryable canonical decision substrate" and "procedural HOW-TO companion" are jargon padding that could be tightened, so it is not fully level-3 lean. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | It gives a concrete instruction ("use the `view_file` tool to read" a specific path) but delegates all actual authoring guidance to the referenced file, leaving the inline actionability incomplete. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | This is a single-purpose router whose one action is unambiguous — read the named guide before creating any files — which meets the simple-skills allowance for a level-3 workflow clarity score. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a clear overview with a well-signaled, one-level-deep pointer to the existing `references/skill-authoring-guide.md`, keeping heavy payload out of the router as the architecture intends. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |