Content
72%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an extremely lean, well-structured redirect that excels at conciseness and progressive disclosure, but it delegates the entire actionable workflow to the reference, leaving in-body actionability and workflow sequencing thin.
Suggestions
Add a brief 2–3 line skeleton of the workflow in the body (e.g. 'populate AC→sub matrix → reconcile delivered vs required evidence → emit verdict: close/keep open/create missing subs/retire-supersede') so the skill is partially actionable without opening the reference.
Surface one concrete validation checkpoint inline — such as 'confirm no RESIDUAL_L4 ACs or BLOCKER subs remain before recommending close' — to give the body a gating step rather than only a redirect.
Include a one-line example of the verdict output format so a reader can recognize the expected result without reading the full reference.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is a single lean paragraph that assumes Claude's competence and contains no padding or restated concepts, matching the 'lean and efficient; every token earns its place' anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | It gives one concrete executable instruction ('use the view_file tool to read ... epic-resolution-workflow.md') but no examples and the actual workflow guidance is delegated to the reference, leaving the body incomplete on its own. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The gating action is unambiguous ('before posting any verdict or recommendation') but the multi-step matrix/verdict workflow is entirely offloaded with no in-body sequence or validation checkpoints. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a clear overview pointing to one real, well-signaled, one-level-deep reference (verified to exist at references/epic-resolution-workflow.md), which is textbook progressive disclosure. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |