Content
72%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is appropriately concise and well-structured as a pointer to a single real reference file, but it provides almost no actionable or workflow detail inline — the entire procedure is offloaded. This is acceptable progressive disclosure but leaves the body itself thin on guidance.
Suggestions
Add a one-line summary of the 3-step protocol (Ingest → Extract friction → Native ideation) so the body gives Claude an executable skeleton before it opens the reference.
Name the tools the workflow requires (search_web, ideation-sandbox) inline so the body is actionable without first loading the reference file.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is a single sentence that defers all detail to a reference file; it assumes Claude's competence and contains no padding, matching the lean-and-efficient anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | It gives one concrete, executable instruction (use the `view_file` tool to read a specific path) but delegates the entire actual procedure to another file, so key operational details are missing from the body itself. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The multi-step workflow (a 3-step abstraction protocol per the reference) lives entirely in the referenced file; the body shows no sequenced steps or validation checkpoints, only a redirect to 'read and strictly adhere to' another file. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a clean overview that points to a single one-level-deep, clearly signaled reference (industry-friction-radar-workflow.md) that exists in ./references/, matching the well-signaled-overview anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |