Content
80%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an exemplary lean progressive-disclosure router that delegates all detail to a single real reference file. Its only weakness is that validation checkpoints for a destructive/batch operation are absent from the body itself, capping workflow clarity.
Suggestions
Add one inline validation checkpoint in the body (e.g. 're-run the duplicate sweep immediately before create_issue, not at turn-start') so the most critical gate is visible without opening the reference.
State the post-creation verification step inline (e.g. confirm the issue number returned and assign via manage_issue_assignees) to surface a feedback loop in the body itself.
Briefly name the six-stage chain or label/title rules in one line so a reader can judge applicability before committing to reading the full reference.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Four lean lines that assume Claude's competence and delegate detail to the reference; every token earns its place with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Gives a concrete, executable routing instruction ("use the `view_file` tool to read `.agents/skills/ticket-create/references/ticket-create-workflow.md`"), but the actual task guidance lives in the reference rather than the body itself. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear routing sequence is present but the body itself contains no validation checkpoints, and because this governs a destructive/batch operation (issue creation plus duplicate sweeps) the rubric cap at 3 takes precedence over the simple-skill exception. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Textbook progressive disclosure: a concise overview router pointing to a single verified one-level-deep reference (`ticket-create-workflow.md` in `./references/`), clearly signaled with an explicit path. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |