Content
87%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an exemplary lean, actionable, well-sectioned single-task skill. Its only gap is that a destructive batch operation lacks an explicit verification/feedback checkpoint beyond the script's own confirmation prompt, which the rubric caps at 2 for workflow clarity.
Suggestions
Add a pre-flight verification step, e.g. run `docker ps -a --filter status=exited` or the script's dry-run/list mode before confirming, so Claude can surface what will be destroyed.
Add a post-run verification such as `df -h` or `docker system df` to confirm space was reclaimed.
Show the confirmation prompt the script emits so Claude knows what to expect and can guide the human through it.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence: a danger banner, one executable command, a delete list, trigger list, and a one-line safety note — every token earns its place with no padding. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | It provides a single concrete, copy-paste-ready executable path (/workspaces/NetAlertX/.devcontainer/scripts/confirm-docker-prune.sh) with no pseudocode, matching the level-3 anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The single action is unambiguous and a human-confirmation checkpoint is noted, but for a destructive batch operation the body lacks an explicit pre-flight verification (e.g. dry-run/listing of what will be removed) and post-run confirmation, which caps destructive workflows at 2 per the rubric. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines, needs no external references, and is organized into clearly labeled sections (Command, What Gets Deleted, When to Use, Safety), satisfying the simple-skill exception for a level-3 score. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |