Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, highly actionable skill body with copy-paste-ready commands for every subcommand and a single cleanly-referenced script, weakened only by minor repeated encoding setup that slightly inflates the token budget.
Suggestions
Consolidate the PYTHONIOENCODING setup into one note in the Notes section instead of repeating it in each command block.
Briefly indicate when to use 'pro' vs 'report' so Claude can pick the right subcommand without inference.
Consider a one-line note that the commands are read-only and safe to retry, removing any ambiguity about validation.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is largely lean and assumes competence with no concept over-explanation, but repeats 'export PYTHONIOENCODING=utf-8' across the pro/report sections and restates the Windows-encoding note, leaving minor padding that could be tightened. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Every subcommand is given as fully executable, copy-paste-ready bash with concrete ticker and period examples plus documented flags, matching the score-5 anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Commands are clearly presented as discrete one-shot read-only actions needing no validation checkpoints, but there is no process flow tying the subcommands together, so it sits just below the explicit-sequence top anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a concise overview with well-organized sections pointing to the single real bundle file scripts/quote.py (verified to exist), one level deep and easy to navigate — fitting the simple-skill exception. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |