Content
76%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable and well-structured with a strong setup validation flow, but it loses points on workflow clarity because destructive operations (delete) lack validation checkpoints, and it carries minor redundancy around the create-vs-save warning.
Suggestions
Add a validation/confirmation checkpoint before destructive operations (e.g. verify the fileId via `read` or list confirmation before `delete`), which would lift the workflow-clarity cap.
Consolidate the repeated "禁止用 create 保存 Markdown" warning into a single prominent pitfall callout to reduce token redundancy.
Consider splitting the full 命令速查 / todo subcommand reference into a bundled reference file to keep SKILL.md a leaner overview, improving progressive disclosure for this multi-task skill.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly lean operational guidance (command tables, exact flags, copy-paste bash) that assumes Claude's competence and avoids explaining concepts, with minor redundancy — the "禁止用 create 保存 Markdown" warning recurs three times and the 命令速查 table overlaps later detailed sections. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable throughout: concrete commands with exact flags and JSON payloads (e.g. `youdaonote -s ydn save --file note.json`, the contentFile/parentId JSON examples) cover the common cases in copy-paste-ready form. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 前置条件 setup flow has a clear decision tree with validation checkpoints (list → detect error → install/upgrade → re-run), but destructive note operations like `delete <fileId>` have no validation/confirmation checkpoint, so per the destructive-operations cap workflow clarity cannot exceed 3. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist, so all content is inline, but it is organized into clearly signaled sections (前置条件, 全局参数, 命令速查, 笔记管理, 网页剪藏, CLI 未安装处理, 故障排查, 注意事项) with a quick-reference table serving as an overview; structure is good with only minor organization gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |