CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

netlify-agent-runner

Run AI agent tasks remotely on Netlify using Claude, Codex, or Gemini. Use when the user wants to run an AI agent on their site, get a second opinion from another model, or delegate development tasks to run remotely against their repo.

65

Quality

78%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./agent-plugin/skills/netlify-agent-runner/SKILL.md

The canonical home for this skill is netlify-agent-runner in netlify/context-and-tools

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-structured, highly actionable skill body built around executable CLI commands, clear flag tables, and a sequenced create->poll->review workflow with terminal-status validation. It is mostly concise and well-organized, with only minor repetition of the async/polling point and no need for external bundle files.

Suggestions

Consolidate the repeated 'asynchronous / no callbacks / poll with agents:show' explanation so it appears fully once (e.g. under How Agent Tasks Run) and is only briefly referenced elsewhere, to tighten conciseness.

The Use Cases table is long; consider moving it to a references file and keeping a short top-3 list inline to improve progressive disclosure.

Add a brief validate->retry note for the permission/approval flow (e.g. what to do if the user declines or a prerequisite is missing) to make the workflow feedback loop fully explicit.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is largely lean reference material (command tables, code blocks, status values) that respects Claude's competence; a few sections restate the same async/no-callback/poll point multiple times (Prerequisites, How Tasks Run, Using as an Agent) and could be tightened.

4 / 5

Actionability

Provides copy-paste-ready, fully executable CLI commands across create/list/show/stop with flag tables and concrete example prompts; the common cases are comprehensively covered with real command syntax.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The Typical workflow is clearly sequenced (create -> poll until terminal -> review) with explicit terminal-status validation and a guard against acting on non-terminal states; it lacks a formal validate->fix->retry feedback loop, but the poll-until-terminal check serves that role for this non-destructive remote task.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Content is well-organized into clearly headed sections (Prerequisites, How Tasks Run, Creating, Managing, Use Cases, Using as an Agent) with no bundle files to navigate; everything is inline at one level, which is appropriate for this length, though a few reference-heavy sections (Use Cases table) could optionally live in a separate file.

4 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Description

75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong, specific description that names the tool, the supported agents, and gives an explicit 'Use when' clause with concrete triggers. It maintains third-person voice and stays distinct from generic agent skills via the Netlify/remote framing.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the concrete actions (run AI agent tasks remotely, get a second opinion, delegate development tasks) and the agents (Claude, Codex, Gemini), giving multiple specific capabilities with only minor coverage gaps around managing/stopping tasks.

4 / 5

Completeness

Clearly states what the skill does (run AI agent tasks remotely on Netlify using Claude/Codex/Gemini) and gives an explicit 'Use when...' clause with three concrete triggers; 'when' is specific but could enumerate a couple more scenarios.

4 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Includes natural user phrases like 'run an AI agent on their site', 'get a second opinion from another model', and 'delegate development tasks', plus model names users would say; missing a few common synonyms like 'code review' or 'remote agent'.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The Netlify/remote-infrastructure framing and specific model names give it a clear niche with minimal overlap risk; only minor overlap with generic 'run an agent' skills, and the third-person voice is maintained throughout.

4 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
netlify/context-and-tools
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.