Evaluate GitHub issues against the repository's code of conduct. Use when: (1) A new issue is created and needs conduct review, (2) Part of issue intake pipeline, (3) Evaluating whether issue content violates community guidelines. If violations are found, sanitizes offending content (including title, body, and comments) while preserving technical substance and notifies the author. Intelligently replaces titles when sanitization renders them meaningless.
72
71%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
60%
1.07xAverage score across 3 eval scenarios
Advisory
Suggest reviewing before use
Optimize this skill with Tessl
npx tessl skill review --optimize ./.claude/skills/code-of-conduct-check/SKILL.mdSecurity
1 medium severity finding. This skill can be installed but you should review these findings before use.
The skill exposes the agent to untrusted, user-generated content from public third-party sources, creating a risk of indirect prompt injection. This includes browsing arbitrary URLs, reading social media posts or forum comments, and analyzing content from unknown websites.
Third-party content exposure detected (high risk: 0.95). The workflow fetches GitHub issue title/body and all outsider-authored comments at runtime via `gh issue view $1 --repo $0 --comments --json comments`, then evaluates/sanitizes that free text for violations, which is fed into the agent’s LLM context.
6b797b3
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.