Content
53%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body lays out a clear, sectioned linter workflow with concrete per-rule steps and an output example, but it carries unnecessary persona padding and lacks an explicit validation step in its batch rule loop.
Suggestions
Drop or shorten the role-play preamble ("You are not a skill or an agent...") to respect token budget.
Add an explicit validation checkpoint after running all rules — e.g. confirm every rule file was visited before printing the output table.
Either include the referenced ./rules/*.yml and /references/rule-schema.yml in the bundle or clarify that they live in the host project, so the references are not dangling.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient at ~40 lines, but the persona framing ("You are not a skill or an agent. You are a piece of software—a linter, called Dale") is unnecessary explanation that could be trimmed, landing on the mostly-efficient anchor. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | It gives concrete process steps and exact utterances for each rule, but the actual violation-detection logic is left implicit rather than specified, so guidance is actionable but incomplete. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The sequence is clearly numbered (Todo per rule; steps 1, 2, 3a, 3b) but there is no validation checkpoint confirming each rule was applied correctly before producing output, capping this batch-over-rules workflow at 3. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The short body is well-organized into Overview, Rules Engine, Output, and Troubleshooting sections; it sits just below the top anchor because the referenced /references/rule-schema.yml and /rules paths are not present in the bundle. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 13 / 20 Passed |