Content
80%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A lean, well-structured ruleset that assumes Go competence and points cleanly to deeper docs. Its chief gap is workflow clarity: editing/linting validation is present as rules but not framed as an explicit checkpoint sequence.
Suggestions
Add a short ordered workflow (e.g. 1. Read AGENTS.md 2. Edit *.go 3. Run gofmt 4. Run lints/Makefile target 5. Re-run until clean) with explicit validation checkpoints.
Provide one or two copy-paste command examples such as `gofmt -w <file>` or the relevant Makefile target to lift actionability to fully executable.
Optionally cross-link the runtime rule under a clearly labeled sub-path so the internal/runtime/funcs exception is visually distinct from general Go edits.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Terse bullet directives with no padding and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every line earns its place and assumes Go competence. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, executable directives naming specific tools and files (gofmt, .golangci.yml, go.mod, Makefile, AGENTS.md), but lacks copy-paste-ready command invocations for the common cases. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | An implicit sequence exists (read AGENTS.md before editing, then gofmt/lint), but validation steps appear as standalone rules rather than explicit checkpoints in a sequenced workflow. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A clear, short overview organized into Rules and Runtime sections, with one-level-deep, clearly signaled references (AGENTS.md, Effective Go, docs/developer/runtime-functions.md) and no nested indirection. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |