Capture or triage small Neva repository and engineering-harness frictions without derailing feature work.
64
76%
Does it follow best practices?
Run evals on this skill
Adds up to 20 points to the overall score
View guide
Passed
No findings from the security scan
Fix and improve this skill with Tessl
tessl review fix ./.codex/skills/papercut/SKILL.mdUse this skill when a person or agent encounters minor friction while doing other Neva work: a flaky command, stale cache, misleading error, obsolete script, or documentation that contradicts observed behavior.
The journal is .codex/papercuts.md.
It is not an issue tracker. Product, language, compiler, and runtime defects
belong in their owning GitHub issue or change; already-tracked work stays there.
Keep working on the original task unless the friction blocks it.
Add one entry directly below the journal marker, newest first:
## YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM TZ — author or model
What I was doing -> what got in the way. Include the relevant command or
error, workaround, and likely cause or fix when known.Record only evidence already observed. Never put credentials, access tokens, or private data in an entry.
Do not silently broaden the current task to implement a separate fix. Ask for direction when the remediation is material and not already in scope.
127afd9
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.