Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a well-organized, concise accessibility checklist with concrete APIs and thresholds that assumes Claude's intelligence. Its main gap is the absence of complete copy-paste code examples and explicit validation/feedback steps for the audit findings.
Suggestions
Add one or two short executable Compose code snippets (e.g., a clickable Icon with contentDescription and MinTouchTargetSize) to make guidance copy-paste ready.
Include a brief verification step prompting Claude to confirm each flagged issue against its standard (e.g., re-check the computed contrast ratio) before reporting, adding a light feedback loop to the audit workflow.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence (no explaining what a composable or WCAG is); every token earns its place with specific thresholds and APIs inline. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete actionable guidance with specific APIs (contentDescription = null, Modifier.semantics(mergeDescendants = true), heading()) and thresholds (48x48dp, 4.5:1); not 5 because there are no complete copy-paste code blocks, only inline references. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | As a simple single-purpose auditing checklist the single action (analyze the component for these aspects) is unambiguous and clearly sectioned; not 5 because it is a parallel checklist rather than a sequenced workflow with explicit validation checkpoints or feedback loops. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A simple skill well under 50 lines with no need for external references (none exist), and it is cleanly organized into well-labeled sections, satisfying the simple-skill exception. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |