design

Comprehensive design skill: brand identity, design tokens, UI styling, logo generation (55 styles, Gemini AI), corporate identity program (50 deliverables, CIP mockups), HTML presentations (Chart.js), banner design (22 styles, social/ads/web/print), icon design (15 styles, SVG, Gemini 3.1 Pro), social photos (HTML→screenshot, multi-platform). Actions: design logo, create CIP, generate mockups, build slides, design banner, generate icon, create social photos, social media images, brand identity, design system. Platforms: Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube, Instagram, Pinterest, TikTok, Threads, Google Ads.

Quality

—

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

—

No eval scenarios have been run

Securityby

Passed

No known issues

Quality

Content

72%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is highly actionable with executable commands, exact specs, and a clean one-level reference structure that matches real bundle files. Its main weaknesses are mild redundancy between inline tables and referenced guides, and the absence of explicit validation/retry checkpoints for batch generative workflows.

Suggestions

Add explicit validation/retry steps to the generative workflows (e.g., after generate.py, verify output exists and re-run on failure) to lift workflow clarity to 3.

Remove the inline banner/icon/social sizing tables that duplicate references/banner-sizes-and-styles.md and references/social-photos-design.md, linking instead to keep the overview lean.

Tighten the 'When scripts fail, try to fix them directly' note into a concrete diagnosis/retry step rather than a generic instruction.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	Mostly efficient with copy-paste-ready commands and compact tables, but it repeats sizing/style tables inline (banner, icon, social sizes) already covered by referenced files, adding tokens that the references should hold.	2 / 3
Actionability	Provides fully executable python3 commands with concrete flags and example values, plus exact pixel dimensions and clear sub-skill routing — copy-paste ready per the top anchor.	3 / 3
Workflow Clarity	Workflows are sequenced (banner, social photos, complete brand package), but batch/generative operations lack explicit validate-then-retry checkpoints; guidance is just 'fix them directly' or 'visually inspect and re-export' without a structured feedback loop.	2 / 3
Progressive Disclosure	SKILL.md is an overview with well-signaled one-level-deep references in dedicated tables, and the referenced files (verified present in references/) and scripts/ map cleanly to inline citations, enabling easy navigation.	3 / 3
	Total	10 / 12 Passed

Description

75%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is information-dense and specific, listing concrete actions and broad platform coverage, which makes it strong on specificity and trigger terms. It is weakened by the absence of an explicit 'Use when...' trigger clause and by very broad scope that blurs distinctiveness against sibling design skills.

Suggestions

Add an explicit 'Use when...' clause (e.g., 'Use when the user needs brand identity, logos, CIP deliverables, banners, icons, or social photos') to raise completeness to 3.

Narrow or clarify the core niche and explicitly distinguish from the routed-out external skills (brand, design-system, ui-styling) to reduce conflict risk.

Trim the keyword-stuffed style/count/platform lists (55 styles, 50 deliverables, every platform) — they pad length without adding trigger value.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Names many concrete actions ('design logo', 'create CIP', 'generate mockups', 'build slides', 'design banner', 'generate icon', 'create social photos') and concrete deliverables, far exceeding the 'lists multiple specific concrete actions' anchor.	3 / 3
Completeness	It thoroughly answers 'what does this do' but lacks an explicit 'Use when...' clause naming when Claude should invoke it; per the guidelines a missing explicit trigger guidance caps completeness at 2.	2 / 3
Trigger Term Quality	Includes natural user phrasings ('design logo', 'design banner', 'brand identity', 'design system', 'social media images') plus broad platform coverage (Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube, Instagram, Pinterest, TikTok) matching 'good coverage of natural terms'.	3 / 3
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	The 'design' niche is fairly distinct, but the sheer breadth (brand, tokens, UI, logo, CIP, slides, banners, social, icons) overlaps several peer design skills routed out (brand, design-system, ui-styling), risking conflict rather than a clean single niche.	2 / 3
	Total	10 / 12 Passed

Validation

87%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 14 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

Criteria	Description	Result
frontmatter_unknown_keys	Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata	Warning
referenced_paths_exist	Referenced path issues: 12 deeper-than-1-level	Warning

	Total	14 / 16 Passed

Repository: nextlevelbuilder/ui-ux-pro-max-skill
Commit: cc3d1be

Reviewed: 2 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.