Content
71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an exemplary lean, constraint-dense seed spec with a clear sequenced workflow and explicit validation gates. Its one substantial defect is bundle integrity: the core seed artifact `example.html` and the provenance file `ASSET-SOURCES.md` it instructs the reader to use are absent from the bundle, undermining the skill's most important directive.
Suggestions
Ship `example.html` (the seeded runnable source) inside the bundle — e.g. in `assets/` — so the core directive "Start from `example.html`" is actually executable; alternatively point to wherever the host stores the seed.
Include `ASSET-SOURCES.md` (and the referenced LICENSE note) in the bundle, or remove/soften the references so provenance guidance doesn't dangle.
Add an explicit feedback loop after the P0 gate step: 'If any P0 gate fails, fix and re-render before delivery' — making the error-recovery path concrete would lift workflow clarity to the top anchor.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~32-line body is lean and directive throughout: exact hex palette values, element-level contracts ("native `dialog`… Escape handling and focus return", "native `details` / `summary`", "390px", "DPR cap"), with zero padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows. Every token earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Most guidance is unusually concrete (exact colors, interaction contracts, a specific render-and-check list, P0 gates), but the primary directive — "Start from `example.html`. It is the full runnable source" — points to a file that does not exist in the bundle, and `ASSET-SOURCES.md` is likewise missing. With the entry-point artifact unresolvable, the guidance is incomplete on a key detail rather than having only minor gaps, so it sits at 3 rather than 4. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 6-step workflow is clearly sequenced with explicit checkpoints: "Render the page; check hero, all chapter links, menus, modal focus, forms and mobile overflow" and "pass its P0 gates before delivery". It lacks the explicit fix-and-revalidate feedback loop of the 5 anchor, and this is not a destructive/batch skill, so 4 fits. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is well-sectioned and lean with one clearly signaled, one-level-deep reference that resolves (`references/checklist.md` exists). However, two of the three referenced paths (`example.html`, `ASSET-SOURCES.md`) do not exist in the bundle, so scored against the actual bundle structure the navigation is partially broken — matching anchor 3 rather than the 'references mostly clear' bar of 4. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |