Conciseness

The body is lean and assumes competence: a routing table instead of prose, terse plan bullets ("Genre + reference artists (1-2)", "Tempo (BPM) + key"), and no explanations of concepts Claude already knows (no "what is TTS" or "how music generation works"). The only repetition is the MiniMax voice_id rule, which is an intentional hard-rules restatement rather than padding, so this fits the 5 anchor rather than 4.

Actionability

The dispatch command is concrete and nearly copy-paste ready — exact flags ("--audio-kind", "--model", "--duration <audioDuration seconds>", "--output \"<short-slug>-<duration>s.mp3\""), a literal voice_id example ("male-qn-qingse"), and the expected JSON output shape. It falls short of 5 because Step 2 ("Use the format the upstream model prefers") gives no prompt template or example per model, so the single most important input — the assembled --prompt — is left to inference.

Workflow Clarity

Steps 0–4 are clearly sequenced with explicit branching on audioKind, guidance for missing metadata, and a pre-dispatch checkpoint ("TTS runs your script literally. Proof it before dispatching") plus duration/structure sanity rules. It is not 5 because there is no error-recovery loop — nothing instructs what to do if the dispatcher command fails or returns an error payload — only the happy path.

Progressive Disclosure

A single well-organized file (routing table, resource map, workflow, hard rules) with no buried or nested references — appropriate for a skill this compact. It is not 5 because the resource map advertises "└── example.html" but that file is not present in the bundle, so the one external reference it does make is broken.

Specificity

The description lists multiple concrete actions with full coverage: "Routes music requests to Suno V5 / Udio / Lyria, speech to MiniMax TTS / FishAudio / ElevenLabs V3, and SFX to ElevenLabs SFX or AudioCraft" plus a concrete output contract ("one MP3/WAV file saved to the project folder"). It names every sub-mode and its providers, which is comprehensive for this domain, so it matches the 5 anchor rather than 4 (which implies coverage gaps).

Completeness

The "what" is clearly and comprehensively answered, but there is no "Use when..." clause or equivalent trigger guidance inside the description itself ("Audio generation skill — jingles, beds, voiceover, and sound effects. Routes music requests to..."); per the judging guidelines, a missing 'Use when' clause caps completeness at 3. It is not 4 because the "when" is entirely absent from the description field rather than merely imprecise.

Trigger Term Quality

Natural terms are present — "jingles", "beds", "voiceover", "sound effects", "music", "speech", "TTS" — but common variations and extensions are missing: "audio" itself as a request word, "song", "narration", spaced "voice over", and file extensions like .mp3/.wav. This fits the 4 anchor ("good keyword coverage; a few natural terms missing") rather than 5 (comprehensive synonyms/extensions) or 3 (missing common variations more broadly).

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The niche is unambiguous — audio generation with named routing targets (Suno V5, MiniMax TTS, ElevenLabs SFX) and a distinct output contract — so it is clearly distinguishable from document, image, or code skills with minimal conflict risk. It matches the 5 anchor ("clear niche with distinct triggers") rather than 4, since the provider routing leaves virtually no overlap ambiguity with related skills.