CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

build-test

Run the project's build / typecheck / lint / test commands and emit the build.passing + tests.passing signals devloop convergence reads.

66

Quality

80%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./plugins/_official/atoms/build-test/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

100%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is concise, concrete, and action-oriented with a clear convergence workflow and well-organized sections, meeting the rubric's top anchors across all dimensions for this simple skill.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Lean and efficient; every section earns its place, uses concrete tables and code blocks, and avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows.

3 / 3

Actionability

Provides concrete commands by framework, an executable output schema, a copy-paste-ready devloop JSONC wiring example, and a clear pointer to the implementing file.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

Sequences the atom after patch-edit with a gated 'until' convergence condition and enumerates anti-patterns, giving an explicit feedback loop (run until both signals pass or iterations hit 8).

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

For a short, single-purpose skill it is well-organized into focused sections with no external bundle files needed, so the body stands on its own with clear navigation.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Description

60%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is specific and action-oriented but omits explicit 'use when' trigger guidance, which caps completeness, and relies on some internal jargon that weakens trigger term quality and distinctiveness.

Suggestions

Add a 'Use when ...' clause stating when Claude should invoke this skill (e.g. after editing code in a code-migration run to verify the build).

Replace or gloss the internal jargon 'devloop convergence reads' with natural trigger phrasing a user would actually say.

Add a distinguishing phrase tying it to the critique/devloop pipeline to reduce overlap with generic test-runner skills.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists several concrete actions ('Run the project's build / typecheck / lint / test commands', 'emit the build.passing + tests.passing signals') rather than vague descriptions.

3 / 3

Completeness

Clearly answers 'what' it does, but provides no 'Use when...' clause or equivalent trigger guidance for when Claude should reach for it.

2 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Includes 'build', 'typecheck', 'lint', 'test' which users would say, but lacks natural phrasings like 'run the tests' or 'check the build passes' and leans on internal jargon ('devloop convergence').

2 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Fairly specific to build/test signaling within a devloop, but generic terms like 'build' and 'test' could overlap with other dev-loop or test-runner skills.

2 / 3

Total

9

/

12

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
nexu-io/open-design
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.