Content
87%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is well-organized, concise, and actionable with concrete script paths and a clear workflow, supported by a clean progressive-disclosure structure of real reference files. Its main gap is the absence of an explicit validation/verification step in the render workflow.
Suggestions
Add an explicit validation checkpoint after building the scene spec (e.g., confirm the spec JSON has the expected participants, sides, and beats) before preparing the bundle.
Include a verify/render-sanity step before final export (e.g., render a short preview frame to confirm avatar placement and transparent background) so failures are caught early.
Surface the most common export command inline from references/output-modes.md so the core path is copy-paste ready without opening the reference.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence — short numbered steps, compact dimension tables, and bullets — with detail offloaded to references rather than explained inline. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Gives concrete executable script invocations with exact paths ('Run scripts/build_chat_overlay_spec.py', 'Run scripts/prepare_chat_overlay_bundle.py') and points to specific reference files for the remaining commands. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear five-step sequence (normalize → configure → build spec → prepare bundle → render) is present, but there is no explicit validation or verification checkpoint before rendering, and producing a render bundle is a batch/production operation that the rubric caps at 2 without a feedback loop. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is an overview with well-signaled one-level-deep references (references/*.md, scripts/*.py, assets/remotion-template/), all verified to exist, plus a Resources section mapping each file to its purpose. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |