Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, lean, actionable prototype-generation spec with a clear workflow and a concrete output contract. Its only real gaps are a missing explicit verification step in the workflow and the absence of a starter HTML example.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and directive with no explaining of concepts Claude already knows; minor aesthetic flourishes ('soft liquid motion, glassy surfaces') could be trimmed, matching the 'efficient; minor instances' anchor rather than the fully minimal 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, specific guidance ('extract 6-10 core concepts', named three-view structure, exact artifact identifier, 1280px/<900px breakpoints) with a copy-paste output-contract wrapper; the absence of a full starter HTML example is a minor gap that keeps it below 5. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 6-step numbered sequence is present and the operation is non-destructive; the 'Interaction Requirements' and 'Output Contract' serve as a checklist, but there is no explicit validate/verify step in the workflow itself, matching the 4 anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | This is a ~50-line single-file skill with no bundle files and five well-organized sections (Use When, Workflow, Visual Direction, Interaction Requirements, Output Contract); the simple-skill exception applies, so well-organized sections alone warrant a 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |