Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tight, well-structured operational contract with concrete protocol tags, config variables, and an explicit ship-gate checkpoint. Its main gap is the absence of a worked envelope example and an explicit fix-retry loop.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is operationally dense — specific tags, config vars, and endpoints — and avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows, with only minor explanatory sentences that could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete identifiers throughout (envelope tags, OD_CRITIQUE_* vars, the /interrupt endpoint, critique.* SSE channels, explicit "do not write critique.json" prohibitions) give executable guidance, though no full worked envelope example is shown. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The round sequence is clear with an explicit ship gate (composite meets threshold AND no open must-fix items) plus a max-rounds cap and interrupt flow; the fix-then-retry feedback loop is implied rather than spelled out. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A self-contained, ~50-line body with well-organized section headers and no need for external references fits the simple-skill exception for a top progressive-disclosure score. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |