Content
61%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a lean catalogue entry that cleanly points to an upstream bundle, but it delegates the actual skill guidance entirely to an external repo, leaving its own content light on actionable D3 instructions and explicit workflow checkpoints.
Suggestions
Inline at least one minimal executable D3 example so the skill is useful without cloning the upstream bundle, lifting actionability beyond a single git command.
Tighten the 'How to use' steps into an explicit numbered sequence with a verification checkpoint (e.g. confirm the cloned folder is present before invoking), and avoid duplicating the frontmatter description in 'What it does'.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is short and avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows, but repeats the frontmatter description verbatim in 'What it does' and includes a trimmable 'inspect the upstream README' line — minor over-explanation. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides one concrete executable command (`git clone ... skills/snow-d3`) and example prompts, but the actual D3-building guidance is deferred entirely to the upstream repo, leaving the core task instructions incomplete. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A rough sequence exists (inspect upstream → clone into skills/ → invoke by name/trigger) but checkpoints are implicit and one step ('inspect the upstream README for exact paths') is vague; no destructive/batch cap applies. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No local bundle files exist; the body cleanly organizes short sections and signals its one-level-deep reference (the upstream GitHub repo) clearly, though the real detailed content lives outside the skill entirely. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |