Content
100%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, highly actionable instruction skill: concrete specs, a sequenced workflow with a self-check, and clean sectioning with no unnecessary concept explanations. It earns its tokens throughout.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence — it gives specific layout and copy guidance without explaining what a dashboard or bar chart is. It is not a 2 because there is no padded conceptual explanation to tighten. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Guidance is concrete and copy-paste-ready: pixel widths ('220–260px sidebar'), CSS ('font-feature-settings: \'tnum\''), '~30 bars', data-od-id attributes, and an exact artifact format. It is not a 2 because the instructions are executable specifics, not pseudocode or abstract direction. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 5-step sequence (read DESIGN.md, pick voice, layout, write HTML, self-check) ends with an explicit validation checklist. It is not a 2 because the self-check supplies the checkpoint that the anchor-2 example lacks, and the task is non-destructive so no retry loop is required. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist, and the self-contained body is organized into clear sections (Workflow, Output contract) with the only external doc (DESIGN.md) injected rather than nested. It is not a 2 because content is appropriately organized with no monolithic wall of text or multi-level references. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |