Content
80%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A disciplined, token-efficient design spec with exact, executable constraints (hexes, CSS values, font stack, output format) and a clear layout inventory. Weaknesses are the implicit workflow — no explicit step order or validation of the generated HTML — and the absence of even one concrete layout code example to anchor the terse per-layout descriptions.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and dense throughout: every line is a hard constraint ('border-radius: 0', '1px hairline borders, 严禁阴影 / 渐变 / blur') with zero padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Highly concrete guidance — exact hexes, 'grid-template-columns: repeat(16, 1fr); gap: 0', named fonts, font sizes ('9.6vw display, body 14-16px, label 11px uppercase letterspacing 0.08em'), per-layout structure, and a single-file HTML output contract. Minor gap: no HTML snippet showing any of the 22 layouts. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The sequence is implicit (pick one of 4 themes → select layouts from the pool, count driven by content → apply design rules → emit single-file HTML) with no explicit step ordering and no validation/checkpoint step for the generated output. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is ~42 lines with no bundle files (no references/scripts/assets exist) and is clearly sectioned (【意图】/【主题】/【布局】/【设计细节】), matching the simple-skill case where well-organized sections alone suffice. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |