deck-swiss-international

16-column grid, one saturated accent, and 22 locked layouts (Klein Blue, Lemon, Mint, Safety Orange).

Quality

65%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/deck-swiss-international/SKILL.md

Quality

Content

87%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is an exceptionally lean, actionable design spec with concrete CSS, hex, and font values and well-organized sections. Its main weakness is that content is structured as a reference spec rather than a sequenced workflow with validation checkpoints.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body is dense, terse, spec-style ('只用直角: 全程 border-radius: 0', 'grid-template-columns: repeat(16, 1fr); gap: 0') with no padding and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows.	3 / 3
Actionability	Concrete executable values throughout—exact hex codes (#002FA7), CSS properties, font stacks (Inter Tight / Noto Sans SC / JetBrains Mono), and precise sizes (9.6vw, 14-16px, 11px)—make the guidance copy-paste ready; per the rubric's instruction-only note, the absence of full HTML templates is not penalized.	3 / 3
Workflow Clarity	Constraints are organized by topic (theme, layouts, iron rules) rather than as a sequenced workflow, and there are no explicit validation checkpoints before emitting the single-file HTML output.	2 / 3
Progressive Disclosure	No bundle files exist and the body is under 50 lines, organized into four clearly labeled sections (意图/主题/布局/设计细节), meeting the rubric's simple-skill threshold for full marks.	3 / 3
	Total	11 / 12 Passed

Description

42%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is distinctive and concrete about the deck's visual properties but reads as a noun-phrase spec rather than an action statement, and it omits any natural trigger terms or 'Use when...' guidance. Users would be unlikely to invoke it from this description alone.

Suggestions

Lead with an action verb, e.g. 'Generates a Swiss International-style slide deck...'.

Add natural trigger terms users would say: 'slides', 'deck', 'presentation', 'Swiss/international typographic style'.

Append a 'Use when...' clause stating when Claude should choose this skill over generic presentation tools.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Quotes concrete domain specifics like '16-column grid, one saturated accent, and 22 locked layouts (Klein Blue, Lemon, Mint, Safety Orange)', but these are noun-phrase properties with no action verbs describing what the skill actually does.	2 / 3
Completeness	It states what the deck looks like but provides no 'Use when...' clause or equivalent trigger guidance, capping completeness at 2 per the rubric guidelines.	2 / 3
Trigger Term Quality	Terms like '22 locked layouts', 'one saturated accent', and 'Klein Blue' are internal template jargon; a user needing this skill would more naturally say 'slides', 'deck', 'presentation', or 'Swiss design', none of which appear in the description.	1 / 3
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	The highly specific visual signature (16-column grid, fixed palette of named accents, 22 locked layouts) carves a clear niche that is unlikely to trigger for an unrelated skill.	3 / 3
	Total	8 / 12 Passed

Validation

93%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

Criteria	Description	Result
frontmatter_unknown_keys	Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata	Warning

	Total	15 / 16 Passed

Repository: nexu-io/open-design
Path: skills/deck-swiss-international/SKILL.md
Commit: f2760fd

Reviewed: about 16 hours ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.