Content
72%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a compact, well-structured overview that specifies concrete output artifacts and a completion condition, but it presents the process implicitly rather than as a sequenced workflow and lacks an explicit validation checkpoint before the destructive rollback step. Progressive disclosure is excellent for a self-contained single-file skill.
Suggestions
Replace the scattered implicit flow with a numbered step sequence so the render → surface → capture → persist/rollback order is explicit.
Add an explicit validation checkpoint before the reject rollback (e.g. verify decision.json is well-formed and that affected files are within plan/steps.json files[] before running git restore).
Trim the editorial opener ("is worthless without a human-reviewable diff") to tighten conciseness toward a lean 5.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean (~40 lines) and assumes Claude's competence — it never explains what a diff, GenUI, or unified diff is; minor editorial padding ("a code-migration / tune-collab handoff is worthless without a human-reviewable diff") keeps it at anchor 4 rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, actionable artifacts are specified: the output file tree, the decision.json schema with enumerated fields, the three top-level choices, and the rollback command "git restore"; the gap is that "raises a choice GenUI surface" is abstract about mechanism, matching anchor 4 (mostly executable guidance with minor gaps). | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The flow (inputs → diff/summary → surface → decision.json → accept writes handoffKind / reject rolls back) is implied across sections rather than listed as a sequence, and the destructive rollback via "git restore" lacks an explicit validate-before-act checkpoint, so per the destructive-operation cap workflow clarity is held at 3. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines with no bundle files (references/scripts/assets absent) and is organized into clearly signaled sections (Inputs, Output, Convergence, Anti-patterns, Status), meeting the simple-skill exception for a top score; the only referenced paths are external implementation files noted for status, not navigational bundle references. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |