Content
93%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an efficient, highly actionable instruction set for a single design task, with concrete structural and styling specifics and a tidy output contract. The only gap is the absence of an explicit validate-fix-retry loop around the self-check, which keeps workflow clarity just below top marks.
Suggestions
Add a feedback loop after the self-check: if a check fails (e.g., italic accent missing or mono misused), state the corrective action and that Claude should re-verify before emitting the artifact.
Optionally turn the self-check bullets into a copy-paste checklist with explicit pass/fail criteria so the validation step is unambiguous.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient throughout — every line is actionable layout/output guidance with no padding and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Highly concrete guidance despite being instruction-only: specific dimensions (600×860), rotation (±0.6deg), required data-od-id attributes, and an explicit artifact output template covering the common case. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear five-step sequence ending in a self-check checklist, but there is no explicit fix-and-retry feedback loop, so it sits just below the anchor that requires feedback loops for error recovery. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Single self-contained SKILL.md with well-organized Workflow and Output contract sections and no need for external references — appropriate for a focused single-purpose skill. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |