Content
75%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is concise and well-structured, but the output contract uses a placeholder instead of executable code and the workflow lacks a validation checkpoint or inline signposting to the provided checklist reference.
Suggestions
Replace the `<html>...</html>` placeholder in the output contract with a concrete, self-contained HTML scaffold or a pointer to copy from `assets/template.html`.
Add a final validation step to the workflow, e.g. 'Run through references/checklist.md P0 items and confirm all pass before emitting the artifact.'
Link `references/checklist.md` inline in the workflow so its existence is clearly signaled rather than only listed in the resource map.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean — a short intro, a resource map, a numbered workflow, and a compact output contract — with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Steps reference a real `assets/template.html` and name concrete interactions, but the output contract is an XML stub (`<html>...</html>`) rather than executable, copy-paste-ready guidance, so it stops short of fully concrete code. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The five-step sequence is clear, but there is no validation/verification checkpoint (e.g., running the checklist or confirming the three slides), and a destructive generate-an-artifact workflow without verification caps clarity at 2. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | A resource map lists `assets/template.html` and `references/checklist.md`, but the body does not signpost or link the checklist inline, so the one-level-deep reference is present but not clearly navigated to. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |