Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A lean, well-structured template skill body with concrete workflow steps and a precise output contract. Its main weaknesses are integration of the bundle: the checklist reference is listed but never invoked, sandbox-hostile APIs are named without enumeration, and the resource map advertises an example.html that is missing from the bundle.
Suggestions
Add a final workflow step that invokes the reference, e.g. "6. Validate the finished deck against `references/checklist.md` (P0 items are blocking)", which would also give the workflow an explicit validation checkpoint.
Fix the resource map and frontmatter outputs: `example.html` is listed at the skill root (and required by the checklist's P0) but is missing from the bundle — either ship it or remove it from the map.
Point the "no sandbox-hostile APIs" rule at the checklist's concrete list (localStorage, sessionStorage, alert, confirm, prompt, window.open) or inline that enumeration so the constraint is checkable from the body alone.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~40-line body is lean and efficient — a one-line intro, a file map, five terse workflow steps, and a copy-paste output contract — with zero padding and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows, matching the 5 anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | The guidance is mostly executable: "Start from `assets/template.html`", keep "keyboard navigation (`ArrowLeft` / `ArrowRight`)", "keep the file self-contained (inline CSS/JS)", plus an exact artifact block for output. It falls short of 5 because "no sandbox-hostile APIs" is never enumerated in the body, and the workflow never tells Claude to actually consult `references/checklist.md`, leaving those concrete details unreachable. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The five-step workflow is a clear, well-sequenced instruction set with explicit preserve-constraints (structure, hierarchy, interactions, motion). It is not 5 because there is no validation checkpoint, even though `references/checklist.md` exists precisely for verification and is never wired into the sequence — a minor but real gap versus the explicit-checkpoint anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Structure exists (resource map, workflow, output contract) and references are one level deep, but scoring against the actual bundle reveals two problems: the resource map lists `example.html` at the skill root and it does not exist in the bundle, and `references/checklist.md` appears only as a tree entry with no in-text navigation or 'see' signal from any workflow step. This fits the 3 anchor — references present but not clearly signaled — rather than 4. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |