Content
72%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a lean, well-structured design spec that efficiently delivers concrete visual rules and per-document-type structures. Its main gaps are the lack of an executable HTML/CSS starter template and missing guidance for choosing among the eight document types.
Suggestions
Add a minimal copy-paste HTML/CSS starter (font-family stacks, the color tokens, the hairline rule) so the template skeleton is executable rather than inferred.
Provide brief decision guidance for selecting a document type from the eight options based on user content signals (length, structure, purpose).
For multi-page outputs (Long Doc, Slides), note a quick validation step such as confirming page count or section breaks before finalizing.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and assumes Claude's competence: it never explains known concepts (what a serif is, what Tailwind is) and packs every line with concrete specs (hex values, font stacks, line-height ranges, forbidden effects) so each token earns its place. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | It gives concrete, specific values (exact hex colors, named font fallback chains, line-height ranges) but no executable HTML/CSS starter skeleton for a skill whose output is a single-file HTML page, leaving implementation details to interpretation. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Document-type structures are sequenced clearly (e.g. Long Doc: 封面页 → 目录 → 章节 → 注释脚注 + 文末 colophon), but there are no validation/feedback checkpoints and selection among the eight doc types is left to "按用户内容判断" with no decision guidance. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | It is a single well-organized file under 50 lines with no external references, and its sections (意图, 硬性视觉签名, 可选文档类型, 设计准则) are clearly labeled and easy to navigate — meeting the simple-skills exception for progressive disclosure. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |