Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-organized, lean specification with explicit convergence validation and error handling. The only weaker dimension is actionability, since it describes behavior in spec form rather than providing copy-paste executable code.
Suggestions
Add a minimal concrete invocation example (e.g. the exact `od plugin apply` command with a real fileUrl and token routing) to move actionability from spec-level to copy-paste ready.
Optionally show a one-line snippet of the expected `tree.json` / `tokens.json` shape so downstream atoms have a directly verifiable contract.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and structured (tables, a tree diagram, tight bullets) and assumes Claude's competence without explaining what Figma or OAuth is; every section earns its place, matching the level-3 anchor rather than the padded level-2 example. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Concrete guidance exists ("od plugin apply --input fileUrl=…", JSON shapes, file paths), but the body is a spec describing behavior rather than copy-paste executable code, so it stops at the level-2 "some concrete guidance but incomplete" anchor. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | For this single-action atom the flow is unambiguous and includes an explicit convergence validation ("figma.tree.nodes >= 1") plus error recovery (emit error event, user fixes auth or picks another file), meeting the level-3 anchor for single-task skills. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and none are needed; the content is split into well-organized, self-contained sections (Inputs, Output, Convergence, Anti-patterns, Status), which per the simple-skill note earns level 3 on organization alone. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |