Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, well-organized instruction-style body with a clear sequenced workflow and an explicit self-check. Its main gap is the absence of any executable HTML example or skeleton for a code-producing skill, leaving actionability short of fully copy-paste-ready.
Suggestions
Add a minimal starter HTML skeleton (head, a palette-token CSS block, and the masthead + one KPI card) so the output contract demonstrates the actual HTML structure to copy.
Show one concrete inline-SVG snippet (e.g. the revenue trend line+area) so chart construction guidance becomes executable rather than descriptive.
Pair the step-5 self-check with a short fix-and-retry note (e.g. 'if a number doesn't tie, re-label or move it to a caption before emitting') to close the validation loop.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean with no padding and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows (it assumes HTML/CSS competence and just specifies the report). Not level 2, since there is no unnecessary explanation to tighten — every section (workflow, output contract) earns its place. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Guidance is concrete on what to build (named KPI cards, chart types, table rows, a self-check) but, for a skill whose output is an HTML file, provides no executable HTML example or skeleton. This matches anchor 2 (concrete guidance but incomplete, missing key details) rather than level 3's copy-paste-ready examples. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 5-step sequence culminating in an explicit self-check ("every number ties to a labelled chart or table; deltas show direction and percentage; accent colour used at most twice") serves as a validation checkpoint and checklist. Not level 2: validation is explicit and present, and the operation is non-destructive so a full fix-retry loop is not required to cap the score. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with well-organized sections (Workflow, Output contract) and no need for external references, which the rubric explicitly permits to score 3. Not level 2: content is appropriately compact and sectioned rather than a monolithic wall. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |