Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An efficient, well-structured instruction body with a precise layout spec and an explicit self-check, though it omits any starter HTML/SVG code and an explicit error-retry loop. Strong progressive disclosure for a compact single-purpose skill.
Suggestions
Add a minimal starter HTML skeleton or one inline-SVG chart example so the layout spec is copy-paste ready rather than prose-only.
Turn the Self-check into an explicit feedback loop: 'If a number does not tie to a chart/table, fix it and re-check before emitting the artifact.'
Optionally reference a small CHARTS.md or ACCOUNTS.md for the SVG chart and top-accounts table patterns if the spec grows beyond the single screen.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean ~30-line body that assumes Claude's competence — it never explains what a P&L, KPI, or SVG is, and every line is actionable instruction with no padding. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Highly concrete layout spec — exact KPI cards (Revenue, Net new MRR, Gross margin, Cash runway), chart types (inline SVG line+area, bar), and table columns — but provides no starter HTML or SVG template, leaving a minor gap for a code-producing skill. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Five clearly sequenced steps culminating in a checklist-style 'Self-check' validation step, but it lacks an explicit fix-and-retry feedback loop, stopping just short of the anchor-5 bar. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A single-purpose skill well under 50 lines with clean sections (Workflow, Output contract) and a clearly signaled one-level reference to DESIGN.md; per the simple-skills note, well-organized sections suffice for a 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |