Content
72%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is lean and well-organized with no padding, but its guidance is a redirect: rather than an executable workflow it tells the reader to open a GitHub URL and consult an external README, leaving it concrete but incomplete.
Suggestions
Replace the `open https://...` redirect with the actual install command/path for the upstream bundle so the guidance is copy-paste ready.
Spell out the invocation sequence as explicit numbered steps with a verification checkpoint (e.g., confirm the skill appears in the agent's skills directory before invoking).
Inline the core entry-point instruction from the upstream README instead of deferring all detail to an external source.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is short and lean with no filler or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; it respects the token budget and assumes competence, even though it restates the description in "What it does". | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | It gives some direction (install the upstream bundle, invoke by name or trigger phrases) but the only concrete command is `open https://github.com/openai/skills`, which merely opens a page; real steps and exact paths are deferred to the external README. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A minimal implicit sequence exists (install upstream bundle, then invoke by name/triggers), but it has no explicit checkpoints or validation, and the concrete steps are punted to "inspect the upstream README for exact paths." | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | With no local bundle files present, this under-50-line skill is well organized into clear sections (What it does / Source / How to use) with a clearly signaled external reference, satisfying the rubric's simple-skill allowance for a top score. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |