Content
72%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an unusually disciplined design spec: locked tokens, exact dimensions, a slide-master table, and explicit do-not-touch rules make it nearly self-executing. Its weaknesses are the missing seed file in the bundle, which breaks the "start from example.html" workflow at step one, and the absence of any ordered build-and-verify sequence for the resulting deck.
Suggestions
Ship `example.html` (and the LICENSE) inside the skill bundle — e.g. in an `assets/` or `references/` directory — and update the body's reference to that path so the locked-seed instruction is executable; currently the skill folder contains only SKILL.md.
Add a short ordered workflow with a validation pass: copy the seed → replace content per the master table → verify no overflow/overlap per slide, tone alternation (max two same-tone slides), and 2px rule usage → spot-check navigation and print output before delivering.
If the seed file cannot be bundled, inline the minimal HTML skeleton (deck-stage wrapper, one section, the `:root` block) so the skill does not depend on a file the reader cannot open.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is a dense design spec — exact hex tokens, px sizes, class names, and runtime rules — none of which Claude could know; it explains no general concepts. The only trim candidate is the upstream link appearing in both the intro and the Attribution section, which is negligible. Matches anchor 5: every token earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is copy-paste ready in the concrete sense: a verbatim `:root` token block, exact slide-master classes and dimensions, and explicit keep-verbatim rules. It falls short of 5 because the core executable step — "Start from `example.html` in this plugin folder. It is the locked seed" — points to a file that does not exist in the skill bundle (only SKILL.md ships), so step one cannot be executed as delivered. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The sequence is only implied by section order (start from seed → replace content per masters → respect rhythm and guardrails), with no ordered steps and no validation checkpoint for the finished deck (e.g., check overflow, tone alternation, nav/print behavior). The guardrails are stated as constraints, not as a verify-and-fix loop. Not 4: checkpoints are missing rather than minor-gapped; not 2: the constraints do encode most of what to check. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A single well-sectioned SKILL.md with clear headers and a one-level reference to the seed file — but scored against the actual bundle, `example.html` and the referenced LICENSE file are absent (no references/, scripts/, or assets/ directories exist), so the most important reference cannot be resolved. Not 5 due to the unresolvable seed reference; not 3 because the structure and signaling of what exists are genuinely good. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |