Content
71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A thorough, highly actionable gsap.utils reference with excellent executable examples, but it is long and inlines the entire API surface rather than splitting detail into a bundled reference file, and repeats the function-form explanation.
Suggestions
Move the full per-utility API reference into a bundled references/ file (e.g. API.md) and keep SKILL.md as an overview pointing to it, so progressive_disclosure can score higher.
Consolidate the 'omit the value to get a function' explanation into the overview once instead of restating it under clamp, mapRange, normalize, interpolate, snap, wrap, and wrapYoyo.
Tighten the overview section by removing prose that duplicates the per-function examples to improve token efficiency.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The reference assumes Claude's competence without concept filler, but the 'Omitting the value' overview paragraph is repeated per-function and the ~280-line body could be tightened by consolidating the function-form explanations. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Nearly every utility ships copy-paste-ready JavaScript with concrete inputs and expected outputs, covering value, function-form, and array variants plus the distribute config table. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear 'When to Use', 'Best practices', and 'Do Not' sections give unambiguous decision guidance with no destructive/batch operation needing validation, though it is a reference rather than a sequenced multi-step workflow. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized with clear section headers and one-level external gsap.com links, but the full ~280-line API surface is inlined in SKILL.md with no bundle split, fitting the 'content that should be separate is inline' pattern. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |