Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, actionable entry point: a clear sequenced authoring workflow with concrete file paths and a real footgun explained, plus clean progressive disclosure that delegates detail to the master skill. Its main weakness is the lack of an explicit verification checkpoint after the fragile runtime-rewiring step.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is efficient and high-signal — it delegates all authoring rules to the master skill rather than restating them, and only expands where there is a genuine non-obvious footgun (the breaking ../../../assets URLs); step 3 runs slightly long, keeping it just below the lean 'every token earns its place' bar. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is concrete and specific: exact template folder, the four named files to copy (fonts.css, base.css, animations/animations.css, runtime.js), exact path rewrites (../../../assets/... to project-local paths), and exact class/tag patterns (.tpl-course-module, <aside class="notes">); it stops short of literal copy-paste code blocks, leaving minor gaps of opening the template files to execute. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear six-step sequence (read master skill → copy template → bring the runtime via Recipe A/B → pick theme → replace demo content → add speaker notes) with a built-in failure-mode warning in step 3; the only gap is the absence of an explicit 'verify the deck activates' checkpoint. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | It is a focused entry-point overview that delegates detailed rules to the master skill (../html-ppt/SKILL.md) and the full-decks catalog (../html-ppt/references/full-decks.md) via well-signaled, one-level-deep references, with no bulk inlined content. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |