Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tightly scoped, highly actionable entry-point skill with a clear sequenced workflow and good one-level-deep references; its only weakness is verbosity in the asset-path explanation.
Suggestions
Trim Step 3's diagnosis of why parent-relative URLs fail to a single sentence, keeping just the two concrete recipes (copy+rewrite vs inline).
Consider a one-line verification nudge (e.g. open index.html locally to confirm slides and keyboard navigation render) after Recipe A/B.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient, but Step 3 over-explains the asset-path failure mode ("those parent-relative URLs no longer resolve and ... will 404 — meaning the deck never activates") which Claude can infer and could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | It gives copy-paste-ready specifics: exact template paths, the `.tpl-tech-sharing` body class to keep, the four asset files to copy, and concrete `<link id="theme-link">` instructions. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear six-step sequence with concrete sub-steps and an explicit guardrail ("never put presenter-only text on the slide"); no destructive/batch operation requires a validation checkpoint here. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is an overview/entry point with well-signaled one-level-deep references to the master skill, the full-decks catalog, the upstream repo, and the LICENSE file. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |