Content
67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a focused, well-structured pointer card with unusually concrete authoring guidance — exact paths, URL-rewrite recipes, and a guardrail against shipping broken asset URLs. Its weaknesses are a verbose step 3, missing final validation steps, and total dependence on an external master-skill file for the actual authoring rules.
Suggestions
Add a final validation step to the workflow, e.g. 'Open the copied index.html and confirm base.css/animations.css/runtime.js load and keyboard navigation works before delivering.'
Tighten step 3: state the fix rule once with a single before/after <link> tag example instead of listing all four filenames twice and repeating the 404 warning.
Include a concrete theme-swap snippet (the <link id='theme-link'> tag with a sample theme path) so the theme step is copy-paste ready.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient with no explaining of concepts Claude already knows, but step 3 spends 16 lines listing all four asset filenames twice and restates the same 404 warning twice ("will 404 — meaning the deck never activates..." and "do not ship the upstream ../../../assets/... URLs verbatim... they only work in-tree"). This matches 'Mostly efficient but includes some unnecessary explanation or could be tightened' rather than 4, where over-explanation would be only minor. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is highly concrete: exact copy paths ("copy index.html and style.css into the project, keep the .tpl-weekly-report body class"), exact before/after URL forms ("../../../assets/... to ... assets/runtime.js"), the theme mechanism ("via <link id='theme-link'> and let T cycle"), and notes placement ("<aside class='notes'>"). Not 5 because there are no verbatim paste-ready snippets (e.g. the rewritten <link> tags or a theme-swap example) for the common cases. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps 1-6 are clearly sequenced and step 3 embeds an explicit pitfall warning and guardrail ("do not ship the upstream ../../../assets/... URLs verbatim into a project artifact"), acting as a preventive checkpoint. Not 5 because no verification step exists — nothing tells the author to confirm the copied deck loads, that the rewritten URLs resolve, or that keyboard navigation works before delivery. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | This is a thin, well-organized entry-point card: clearly signaled one-level-deep links to the master skill ([../html-ppt/SKILL.md]), the full-decks catalog, the template folder, and the LICENSE, with appropriately split content. Not 5 because every referenced path lives outside this bundle (no references/, scripts/, or assets/ directories ship with the card and the ../html-ppt tree is not present), so navigation cannot be verified from the skill itself. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |