Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, actionable entry point that hands off detailed rules to the master skill while giving concrete template-copying and asset-rewriting recipes. It is concise and navigable, with only minor gaps in literal code snippets and validation steps.
Suggestions
Add a short before/after HTML snippet showing one rewritten <link> tag to make Recipe A/B fully copy-paste ready.
Include a quick verification step (e.g., open index.html and confirm slides advance) to add a light validation checkpoint.
Consider a one-line 'What you'll get' summary up top so users can confirm the template choice before following the recipes.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence, with exact paths and recipes; only minor prose in step 3 ('meaning the deck never activates and slide navigation is dead') could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete source/destination paths and an explicit from→to tag-rewrite recipe (Recipe A/B) are given; the minor gap is that no literal before/after HTML snippet is shown for the rewrites. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear six-step authoring sequence is present with a branching recipe choice; no explicit validation checkpoint, but the task is non-destructive so the cap does not apply. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A clean overview that defers to one-level-deep references (the master skill and full-decks catalog) with clear signaling; no local bundle files exist, so structure is judged on the body and outward references. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |