Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, well-structured template skill: it gives crisp selection guidance (best for / avoid for), a concrete six-step workflow with edge-case handling, and an explicit output contract, all within a lean token budget. The only notable gaps are the absence of any validation checkpoint in the workflow and references to bundle files (example.html, LICENSE, template.json, assets/deck-stage.js) that are not present alongside the SKILL.md.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~60-line body is lean and assumes competence: it explains nothing Claude already knows, and every section (at a glance, best for, avoid for, workflow, output contract, license) earns its tokens, matching anchor 5. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | The workflow is directive and specific ('Clone `example.html`', 'duplicate an existing slide... Update page-number labels') and the output contract gives the exact artifact tag format, but there are no example slide snippets and asset paths are unverifiable, matching anchor 4 rather than fully executable anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Six steps are clearly sequenced and unambiguous, including edge cases (too much/too little content, missing layouts), but there is no validation or verification checkpoint (e.g., confirm the deck renders or page labels are consistent), matching anchor 4's 'minor validation gaps' rather than anchor 3's poorly defined sequence. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is well-organized with clear sections and one-level-deep, clearly signaled pointers to `example.html`, `LICENSE`, and `template.json`, but none of those referenced bundle files are present in the reviewed skill bundle, so navigation cannot be fully verified, matching anchor 4 rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |