Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, concise overview that gives concrete workflow steps and cleanly signals its one-level-deep bundle references. It is strong across all four dimensions, with only minor room to add an HTML snippet example and an optional render-validation checkpoint.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence — it never explains what HTML, decks, or fonts are — with only minor decorative padding (the "At a glance" scheme/formality/density block), matching anchor 4 rather than the fully-trimmed anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, specific guidance throughout — "Clone `example.html`", "Replace placeholder content with the user's real headlines, body copy, numbers, names, dates", an explicit preserve-list (fonts, palette, grid, corner brackets, paper grain), and an `<artifact>` output contract. As an instruction-only skill its actionable guidance earns anchor 4; it stops short of 5 because no actual HTML/slide snippet example is shown. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly ordered 6-step sequence (clone → replace → preserve → adjust length → design missing layouts → keep navigation runtime) with concrete file references, matching anchor 4. It lacks an explicit validation checkpoint, but producing an HTML deck is not a destructive or batch operation, so the cap-at-3 rule does not apply and the gap is minor. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a clean overview with well-signaled one-level-deep references (`example.html`, `template.json`, `./LICENSE`, `assets/deck-stage.js`) and appropriately split sections, matching anchor 5; detail lives in the referenced bundle files rather than being inlined. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |